Documentation

Linglib.Features.Prosody

Features.Prosody #

@cite{pierrehumbert-1980} @cite{beckman-pierrehumbert-1986}

Theory-neutral prosodic types: pitch accents, phrase accents, boundary tones, and the prosodic hierarchy, following the autosegmental-metrical (AM) framework established by @cite{pierrehumbert-1980} for English and extended cross-linguistically by @cite{beckman-pierrehumbert-1986}.

@cite{steedman-2000} uses these types to connect prosodic structure to CCG derivations and information structure.

Overview #

These types are used across multiple theories:

Pitch accent types (@cite{pierrehumbert-1980}, ToBI conventions).

The full inventory of English pitch accents. A starred tone (*) is phonologically linked to the stressed syllable; an unstarred tone in a bitonal accent precedes or follows it at some given space in time.

@cite{pierrehumbert-1980} identified seven possible pitch accent shapes; the H*+H accent was eliminated as a possible pattern, leaving six (@cite{beckman-pierrehumbert-1986} §2.1).

In Japanese, by contrast, the single possible pitch accent shape is a lexically linked H, analyzed as H*+L. The accent location is lexically distinctive, but the shape is fixed. English uses the full inventory to contrast different intonational meanings (e.g., declarative vs. surprise-redundancy vs. impatient reassertion on the same word orange in an orange ballgown; @cite{beckman-pierrehumbert-1986} Fig. 1).

Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For
      @[implicit_reducible]
      Equations

      Is this a bitonal accent (two tones)? Bitonal accents trigger catathesis (@cite{beckman-pierrehumbert-1986} §3.2).

      Equations
      Instances For

        Phrase accent: terminal tone of the intermediate phrase.

        @cite{beckman-pierrehumbert-1986} §4.2–4.3 decompose what @cite{pierrehumbert-1980} called the "phrase accent" into a tone that spreads from the last pitch accent to the edge of the intermediate phrase. The phrase accent is H or L, independent of the boundary tone.

        In Japanese, the accentual phrase boundary L is always L; the only variation is whether an optional H boundary tone follows at the intonation phrase edge.

        Instances For
          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For
            @[implicit_reducible]
            Equations

            Boundary tone: terminal tone of the intonation phrase.

            @cite{beckman-pierrehumbert-1986} distinguish the boundary tone (edge of the intonation phrase) from the phrase accent (edge of the intermediate phrase). Together, the phrase accent and boundary tone produce four terminal configurations: LL%, LH%, HL%, HH%.

            In Japanese, the boundary tone at an intonation phrase edge is always L except in yes/no questions, where H is optional (@cite{beckman-pierrehumbert-1986} §4.2).

            Instances For
              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For
                @[implicit_reducible]
                Equations

                Full terminal contour of an intonation phrase: phrase accent + boundary tone. @cite{pierrehumbert-1980}: four possible combinations.

                Instances For
                  Equations
                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                  Instances For
                    def Features.Prosody.instDecidableEqTerminalContour.decEq (x✝ x✝¹ : TerminalContour) :
                    Decidable (x✝ = x✝¹)
                    Equations
                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                    Instances For

                      Prosodic hierarchy levels.

                      σ < f < ω < AP < φ < ι

                      @cite{beckman-pierrehumbert-1986} establish the accentual phrase (AP) as the domain of pitch accent distribution (at most one accent per AP, §2.2) and the phonological phrase (φ, equivalent to the intermediate phrase / ip in ToBI notation) as the domain of catathesis (§3–4).

                      Used by @cite{kratzer-selkirk-2020} spellout constraints.

                      Instances For
                        @[implicit_reducible]
                        Equations
                        Equations
                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                        Instances For

                          Head-prominence: each prosodic constituent has exactly one prominent daughter (its head). K&S (32).

                          • isHead : Bool

                            Whether this constituent is the head (most prominent) of its parent

                          Instances For
                            Equations
                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                            Instances For

                              How pitch accents relate to the lexicon (@cite{beckman-pierrehumbert-1986} §2.5).

                              • lexical: accent location specified in lexicon, shape fixed. Japanese: H*+L at lexically specified mora. Swedish: accent 1 vs 2. The accent shape cannot signal different intonational meanings.
                              • postlexical: accent shape chosen by intonation, location by prominence. English: 6 pitch accent shapes, location determined by focus/stress. The shape contrasts different intonational meanings (declarative, surprise, impatience, etc.).
                              Instances For
                                Equations
                                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                Instances For
                                  @[implicit_reducible]
                                  Equations

                                  How a morpheme interacts with the prosodic specification of its base. @cite{kiparsky-halle-1977} @cite{rolle-2018}

                                  Orthogonal to AccentSpecification, which classifies word-level accent determination (how is the accent location decided?). ProsodicDominance classifies morpheme-level prosodic interaction (does this morpheme override the base's accent/tone, or respect it?).

                                  The dominant/recessive distinction originates in the accentual morpheme classes of @cite{kiparsky-halle-1977} (deaccenting vs non-deaccenting suffixes in IE) and was generalized to tonal morphology by @cite{rolle-2018} as the GT dominance typology.

                                  • dominant: overrides the prosodic specification of the base. Accent: Japanese -teki removes stem accent (@cite{kawahara-2015}). Tone: Mwaghavul verbalisers replace base melody (@cite{akinbo-fwangwar-2026}).
                                  • recessive: applies only when the base is prosodically unmarked. Accent: Japanese -si 'Mr.' preserves stem accent. Tone: Giphende floating tones dock only to unvalued TBUs.
                                  • neutral: concatenates without prosodic interaction; the general phonological grammar determines the output. Tone: Hausa referential -ⁿn (@cite{rolle-2018}).
                                  Instances For
                                    Equations
                                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                    Instances For
                                      @[implicit_reducible]
                                      Equations

                                      Dominant morphemes override the prosodic specification of their base.

                                      Equations
                                      Instances For
                                        def Features.Prosody.ProsodicDominance.combineAccent (baseAccent : Option ) :
                                        ProsodicDominanceOption

                                        Combine a base accent with a suffix's prosodic dominance.

                                        The accent position (Option Nat) represents a mora- or syllable-indexed accent; none = unaccented.

                                        Equations
                                        Instances For

                                          Transparadigmatic uniformity (@cite{rolle-2018}): dominant morphemes produce the same output regardless of whether the base is accented or unaccented. This is the defining property of dominance — it neutralizes the base contrast.

                                          Recessive morphemes preserve the base contrast: an accented base stays accented, an unaccented base stays unaccented.

                                          Fine-grained affix accent classification (@cite{kawahara-2015} §6).

                                          The 3-way ProsodicDominance (dominant/recessive/neutral) captures only one axis of morpheme–accent interaction. @cite{kawahara-2015}, building on @cite{poser-1984} and @cite{vance-1987}, identifies eight distinct affix accent behaviors in Japanese, differing in whether the affix carries its own accent, whether it deletes or preserves root accent, and whether it inserts a new accent at a particular position.

                                          toProsodicDominance projects back to the coarser 3-way classification: types that preserve root accent when present map to recessive; types that override root accent map to dominant.

                                          • recessive : AffixAccentType

                                            Suffix bears accent; loses to root accent when root is accented. E.g., Japanese -tara (conditional): accented root → root accent preserved; unaccented root → suffix accent surfaces.

                                          • dominant : AffixAccentType

                                            Suffix bears accent; always overrides root accent. E.g., Japanese -ppoi (-ish): root accent deleted, suffix accent surfaces regardless.

                                          • recessivePreAccent : AffixAccentType

                                            No own accent; inserts accent on root-final syllable only when root is unaccented. Preserves root accent when present. E.g., Japanese -si (Mr.): ono → ono'+si; u'ra → u'ra+si.

                                          • dominantPreAccent : AffixAccentType

                                            No own accent; always inserts accent on root-final syllable, deleting root accent. E.g., Japanese -ke (family of): ono → ono'+ke; mu'raki → muraki'+ke.

                                          • accentShifting : AffixAccentType

                                            No own accent; shifts existing root accent to pre-suffix position. Unaccented roots remain unaccented. E.g., Japanese -mono (thing): ka'k(+u) → kaki'+mono; nor(+u) → nori+mono.

                                          • postAccenting : AffixAccentType

                                            Inserts accent immediately after the affix (typically a prefix). E.g., Japanese o- (honorific): huro' → o+hu'ro.

                                          • deaccenting : AffixAccentType

                                            No own accent; deletes root accent. Output is unaccented. E.g., Japanese -teki (的 -like): ke'izai → keizai+teki.

                                          • initialAccenting : AffixAccentType

                                            No own accent; inserts accent on root-initial syllable. E.g., Japanese -zu (group/plural): okamoto → o'kamoto+zu.

                                          Instances For
                                            @[implicit_reducible]
                                            Equations
                                            Equations
                                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                            Instances For

                                              Deaccenting is a special case of dominance (overrides root accent).