Pronoun strength (Cardinaletti & Starke 1999) #
@cite{cardinaletti-starke-1999}
Three-way typology of pronoun forms based on phonological/syntactic deficiency, from @cite{cardinaletti-starke-1999}'s tripartite theory:
- Strong: full, stressed forms — can be coordinated, modified, focused.
- Weak: reduced, unstressed — cannot be coordinated or focused.
- Clitic: phonologically deficient — must attach to a host.
This is per-entry feature substrate consumed by multiple study files: @cite{patel-grosz-grosz-2017}'s PER/DEM typology (each PronounForm carries a list of available strengths) and @cite{ariel-2001}'s Accessibility Marking Scale (where strength corresponds to accessibility level).
@cite{cardinaletti-starke-1999}'s three-way pronoun strength classification.
- strong : PronounStrength
Full, stressed forms (e.g., English me, French moi).
- weak : PronounStrength
Reduced, unstressed forms (e.g., English 'em).
- clitic : PronounStrength
Phonologically deficient, attached to host (e.g., French me, te, le).
Instances For
@[implicit_reducible]
Equations
- Features.instDecidableEqPronounStrength x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
@[implicit_reducible]
Equations
- Features.instReprPronounStrength = { reprPrec := Features.instReprPronounStrength.repr }
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.