Documentation

Linglib.Features.AnsweringSystem

Answering System Typology #

@cite{holmberg-2016}

Cross-linguistic variation in how languages answer polar questions.

The Binary Parameter #

@cite{holmberg-2016}'s central typological contribution: languages divide into two types based on what "yes" means in response to a negative question ("Doesn't John drink?"):

Answer Strategy #

Orthogonally, languages vary in whether answers use dedicated particles or echo the finite verb:

Connection to PolP #

In @cite{holmberg-2016}'s syntax, every finite clause has a polarity head (PolP) bearing a valued or unvalued [±Pol] feature. In polar questions, [±Pol] is unvalued — the answer values it. The answering system parameter determines whether "yes" values the variable as [+Pol] (polarity-based) or affirms the question's primary proposition (truth-based).

How a language interprets "yes" in response to negative polar questions.

The diagnostic: "Doesn't John drink?" → "Yes" means...

  • Truth-based: "He doesn't drink" (affirms the proposition)
  • Polarity-based: "He does drink" (assigns positive polarity)
  • truthBased : AnsweringSystem

    "Yes" affirms the proposition in the question (Japanese, Mandarin, Thai, Cantonese)

  • polarityBased : AnsweringSystem

    "Yes" assigns positive polarity (English, Swedish, German, French, Finnish)

Instances For
    @[implicit_reducible]
    Equations
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      How a language forms answers to polar questions.

      Orthogonal to AnsweringSystem — either system can combine with either strategy.

      • particle : AnswerStrategy

        Dedicated yes/no particles (English yes/no, Japanese hai/iie)

      • verbEcho : AnswerStrategy

        Echoed finite verb (Finnish juo/ei juo, Welsh ydy/nac ydy)

      • mixed : AnswerStrategy

        Both particle and verb echo available (Swedish ja/nej + verb echo)

      Instances For
        @[implicit_reducible]
        Equations
        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For

          A language's polar answer profile: answering system + answer strategy.

          • How "yes" is interpreted relative to negative questions

          • strategy : AnswerStrategy

            How answers are formed (particle, verb echo, or both)

          • hasPolarityReversal : Bool

            Does the language have a dedicated polarity-reversing particle (e.g., Swedish jo, German doch, French si)?

          Instances For
            def Features.instDecidableEqPolarAnswerProfile.decEq (x✝ x✝¹ : PolarAnswerProfile) :
            Decidable (x✝ = x✝¹)
            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For
              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For

                The diagnostic prediction: what does "yes" mean in response to "Doesn't John drink?" under each answering system?

                Returns the polarity of the proposition expressed by "yes".

                Equations
                Instances For

                  Truth-based and polarity-based systems give opposite answers to negative questions.

                  Negation Height and Answering System Derivation #

                  @cite{holmberg-2016} Ch 4.3-4.7 derives the answering system from whether the negation in the question can assign value to the polarity variable [±Pol]. The crucial factor is structural accessibility: if negation is close enough to [±Pol] to value it, the focused answer particle clashes with the inherited negative value → polarity-based. If negation is too distant or not in a c-command relation with [±Pol], the particle freely assigns value → truth-based.

                  This is the book's deepest explanatory contribution: the binary answering-system parameter is not stipulated but derived from independently motivated syntactic variation in negation height.

                  Structural height of sentential negation relative to PolP.

                  Note: this classifies constructions, not languages. A single language may have multiple negation heights (e.g., English has middle by default, low when scoped under an adverb, and high in positively-biased questions).

                  • low : NegationHeight

                    Negation below PolP — VP-internal (Japanese, Mandarin, Thai)

                  • middle : NegationHeight

                    Negation at PolP level — NegP between TP and PolP, or merged with Pol (English default, Swedish, Finnish, German)

                  • high : NegationHeight

                    Negation above PolP — C-domain, scoping over [±Pol] (English -n't in positively-biased questions)

                  Instances For
                    @[implicit_reducible]
                    Equations
                    Equations
                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                    Instances For

                      Derive the answering system from negation height.

                      Low negation → truth-based: negation scopes below [±Pol], so the question's primary proposition includes negation. "Yes" affirms the (negative) proposition.

                      Middle/high negation → polarity-based: negation is at or above [±Pol], so "yes" values [±Pol] as [+Pol] regardless of negation.

                      Equations
                      Instances For

                        Middle and high negation both predict polarity-based systems.

                        Low negation predicts a different system from middle negation.