Accessibility Marking Scale — Referential Form Taxonomy #
@cite{ariel-2001} @cite{arnold-wasow-losongco-ginstrom-2000}
Per-entry feature taxonomy classifying referring expressions by accessibility — the degree to which the referent's mental representation is available to the addressee. Speakers choose between reduced (pronoun) and full (name, description) forms based on this accessibility (@cite{ariel-2001}).
The Accessibility Marking Scale #
AccessibilityLevel is @cite{ariel-2001}'s 18-level ordering from
least accessible (full name + modifier) to most accessible (zero /
pro-drop). This replaces the earlier conflation with DefinitenessLevel
— the accessibility and definiteness scales are non-monotonically
related (names are less accessible than definite descriptions but more
prominent for DOM), so they must be separate types. A coarsening
function toDefLevel bridges to the DOM/DSM scale when needed.
Layer position #
Features/. Sibling of Features/Givenness.lean (the GHZ-6
hierarchy). Both are per-entry feature taxonomies for cognitive
status: AccessibilityLevel classifies forms by their
accessibility-marking behavior; GivennessStatus classifies entities
by cognitive status. Ariel argues (her chapter pp. 62-65) that
AccessibilityLevel's 18 tiers are better empirically supported than
GHZ-6's 6 tiers; both retained as substrate because they serve
different consumer profiles. The GivennessStatus.toAccessibility
projection (in Phenomena/Reference/Studies/Ariel2001.lean) bridges
them.
This module connects Phenomena/Reference/ (form choice) to
Phenomena/WordOrder/ (position choice) via the shared dimension of
NP weight/reduction.
@cite{ariel-2001}'s Accessibility Marking Scale: a fine-grained ordering of referential form types from least to most accessible.
Each constructor represents a class of referring expressions. Speakers use more reduced forms for more accessible referents.
- fullNameMod : AccessibilityLevel
- fullName : AccessibilityLevel
- longDefDescription : AccessibilityLevel
- shortDefDescription : AccessibilityLevel
- lastName : AccessibilityLevel
- firstName : AccessibilityLevel
- distalDemMod : AccessibilityLevel
- proxDemMod : AccessibilityLevel
- distalDemNP : AccessibilityLevel
- proxDemNP : AccessibilityLevel
- distalDem : AccessibilityLevel
- proxDem : AccessibilityLevel
- stressedPronGesture : AccessibilityLevel
- stressedPron : AccessibilityLevel
- unstressedPron : AccessibilityLevel
- cliticizedPron : AccessibilityLevel
- verbalAgreement : AccessibilityLevel
- zero : AccessibilityLevel
Instances For
Equations
- Features.instDecidableEqAccessibilityLevel x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- Features.instReprAccessibilityLevel = { reprPrec := Features.instReprAccessibilityLevel.repr }
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Equations
Numeric rank: 0 (lowest accessibility) to 17 (highest). Higher rank = higher accessibility = more reduced form.
Equations
- Features.AccessibilityLevel.fullNameMod.rank = 0
- Features.AccessibilityLevel.fullName.rank = 1
- Features.AccessibilityLevel.longDefDescription.rank = 2
- Features.AccessibilityLevel.shortDefDescription.rank = 3
- Features.AccessibilityLevel.lastName.rank = 4
- Features.AccessibilityLevel.firstName.rank = 5
- Features.AccessibilityLevel.distalDemMod.rank = 6
- Features.AccessibilityLevel.proxDemMod.rank = 7
- Features.AccessibilityLevel.distalDemNP.rank = 8
- Features.AccessibilityLevel.proxDemNP.rank = 9
- Features.AccessibilityLevel.distalDem.rank = 10
- Features.AccessibilityLevel.proxDem.rank = 11
- Features.AccessibilityLevel.stressedPronGesture.rank = 12
- Features.AccessibilityLevel.stressedPron.rank = 13
- Features.AccessibilityLevel.unstressedPron.rank = 14
- Features.AccessibilityLevel.cliticizedPron.rank = 15
- Features.AccessibilityLevel.verbalAgreement.rank = 16
- Features.AccessibilityLevel.zero.rank = 17
Instances For
Distinct accessibility levels have distinct ranks.
Total order on AccessibilityLevel via the rank pullback,
matching the LinearOrder GivennessStatus / BinaryGivenness
pattern in Features/Givenness.lean.
Equations
Coarsening: each accessibility level maps to one of the 5
DefinitenessLevel categories used for differential argument marking.
This is a many-to-one, non-monotone mapping — names are less
accessible than definite descriptions but more prominent for DOM.
Equations
- Features.AccessibilityLevel.fullNameMod.toDefLevel = Features.Prominence.DefinitenessLevel.properName
- Features.AccessibilityLevel.fullName.toDefLevel = Features.Prominence.DefinitenessLevel.properName
- Features.AccessibilityLevel.lastName.toDefLevel = Features.Prominence.DefinitenessLevel.properName
- Features.AccessibilityLevel.firstName.toDefLevel = Features.Prominence.DefinitenessLevel.properName
- Features.AccessibilityLevel.longDefDescription.toDefLevel = Features.Prominence.DefinitenessLevel.definite
- Features.AccessibilityLevel.shortDefDescription.toDefLevel = Features.Prominence.DefinitenessLevel.definite
- Features.AccessibilityLevel.distalDemMod.toDefLevel = Features.Prominence.DefinitenessLevel.definite
- Features.AccessibilityLevel.proxDemMod.toDefLevel = Features.Prominence.DefinitenessLevel.definite
- Features.AccessibilityLevel.distalDemNP.toDefLevel = Features.Prominence.DefinitenessLevel.definite
- Features.AccessibilityLevel.proxDemNP.toDefLevel = Features.Prominence.DefinitenessLevel.definite
- Features.AccessibilityLevel.distalDem.toDefLevel = Features.Prominence.DefinitenessLevel.definite
- Features.AccessibilityLevel.proxDem.toDefLevel = Features.Prominence.DefinitenessLevel.definite
- Features.AccessibilityLevel.stressedPronGesture.toDefLevel = Features.Prominence.DefinitenessLevel.personalPronoun
- Features.AccessibilityLevel.stressedPron.toDefLevel = Features.Prominence.DefinitenessLevel.personalPronoun
- Features.AccessibilityLevel.unstressedPron.toDefLevel = Features.Prominence.DefinitenessLevel.personalPronoun
- Features.AccessibilityLevel.cliticizedPron.toDefLevel = Features.Prominence.DefinitenessLevel.personalPronoun
- Features.AccessibilityLevel.verbalAgreement.toDefLevel = Features.Prominence.DefinitenessLevel.personalPronoun
- Features.AccessibilityLevel.zero.toDefLevel = Features.Prominence.DefinitenessLevel.personalPronoun
Instances For
Referential form options for referring to a discourse entity. Uses @cite{ariel-2001}'s 18-level accessibility marking scale.
Instances For
An unstressed pronoun is more reduced than a full name.
Next-mention bias: how likely a discourse referent is to be mentioned again in the subsequent utterance. Driven by thematic roles, coherence relations, and discourse structure.
- high : NextMentionBias
- low : NextMentionBias
Instances For
Equations
- Features.instDecidableEqNextMentionBias x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- Features.instReprNextMentionBias = { reprPrec := Features.instReprNextMentionBias.repr }
Accessibility prediction: high next-mention bias licenses reduced referential form (unstressed pronoun); low bias requires full form (full name).
This is the monotone link at the heart of @cite{ariel-2001}'s Accessibility Marking Scale: more accessible referents → more reduced forms. The same relationship underlies the Probabilistic Reduction Hypothesis (more predictable → shorter/more reduced).
Equations
Instances For
The predicted form for high-bias referents is more reduced than for low-bias referents.
NP weight correlate: reduced referential forms are lighter. Approximate number of words in a typical instance of each form. This connects form selection to constituent ordering (heavy NP shift, DLM).
The same choice that makes a referent "more reduced" also makes it "lighter", linking @cite{ariel-2001}'s accessibility hierarchy to @cite{arnold-wasow-losongco-ginstrom-2000}'s heaviness effects.
Equations
- Features.ReferentialForm.typicalWeight Features.AccessibilityLevel.fullNameMod = 4
- Features.ReferentialForm.typicalWeight Features.AccessibilityLevel.longDefDescription = 4
- Features.ReferentialForm.typicalWeight Features.AccessibilityLevel.distalDemMod = 3
- Features.ReferentialForm.typicalWeight Features.AccessibilityLevel.proxDemMod = 3
- Features.ReferentialForm.typicalWeight Features.AccessibilityLevel.fullName = 2
- Features.ReferentialForm.typicalWeight Features.AccessibilityLevel.shortDefDescription = 2
- Features.ReferentialForm.typicalWeight Features.AccessibilityLevel.distalDemNP = 2
- Features.ReferentialForm.typicalWeight Features.AccessibilityLevel.proxDemNP = 2
- Features.ReferentialForm.typicalWeight Features.AccessibilityLevel.lastName = 1
- Features.ReferentialForm.typicalWeight Features.AccessibilityLevel.firstName = 1
- Features.ReferentialForm.typicalWeight Features.AccessibilityLevel.distalDem = 1
- Features.ReferentialForm.typicalWeight Features.AccessibilityLevel.proxDem = 1
- Features.ReferentialForm.typicalWeight Features.AccessibilityLevel.stressedPronGesture = 1
- Features.ReferentialForm.typicalWeight Features.AccessibilityLevel.stressedPron = 1
- Features.ReferentialForm.typicalWeight Features.AccessibilityLevel.unstressedPron = 1
- Features.ReferentialForm.typicalWeight Features.AccessibilityLevel.cliticizedPron = 1
- Features.ReferentialForm.typicalWeight Features.AccessibilityLevel.verbalAgreement = 0
- Features.ReferentialForm.typicalWeight Features.AccessibilityLevel.zero = 0
Instances For
Pronouns are at most as heavy as definite descriptions.
How elaborated a referent's discourse representation is.
@cite{arnold-2026} §2: the key criterion for underspecified singular they is "discourse specificity" — whether the speaker intends to evoke a detailed mental representation for the addressee.
This extends @cite{newman-1992}'s "solidity" (existence of a specific concrete referent) and @cite{newman-1998}'s "individuation" (referents treated as individuals with identity-relevant details).
The scale runs from underspecified (the referent is barely sketched
in the discourse model — quantified, indefinite, or mentioned only in
passing) to elaborated (the referent has a rich, detailed
representation — named, described, central to the narrative).
- underspecified : DiscourseElaboration
The referent's discourse representation is minimal: quantified, indefinite, epicene, or not developed. Identity is unknown or unimportant. "Everyone should make their bed."
- elaborated : DiscourseElaboration
The referent has a rich, detailed discourse representation: named, described, topical, with known personal attributes. "Asia Kate Dillon (born November 15, 1984) is an American actor. They are known for their roles as…"
Instances For
Equations
- Features.instDecidableEqDiscourseElaboration x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
Equations
- Features.instBEqDiscourseElaboration.beq x✝ y✝ = (x✝.ctorIdx == y✝.ctorIdx)
Instances For
Equations
Bridge from Ariel's accessibility scale to discourse elaboration.
@cite{ariel-2001}'s Accessibility Marking Scale describes which referential form is appropriate given how accessible a referent is. Arnold's discourse elaboration is related but distinct: low accessibility tends to co-occur with underspecified elaboration (a referent you haven't mentioned much is both less accessible and less elaborated), but they are not identical.
This coarsening maps high-accessibility forms (pronouns, agreement, zero) to elaborated (these forms require a well-established referent) and low-accessibility forms (full names, descriptions) to underspecified (these forms are used when the referent is being newly introduced or is not yet established). The boundary is approximate.
Equations
- a.toElaboration = if a.rank ≥ 13 then Features.DiscourseElaboration.elaborated else Features.DiscourseElaboration.underspecified
Instances For
Pronouns (high accessibility) correlate with elaborated discourse representations — you use a pronoun for a referent that is already well-established in the discourse.
Full names (low accessibility) correlate with underspecified discourse representations — the referent is being (re-)introduced.