Utility–loss duality for finite decision problems #
The bridge between [vR03a]'s utility scale (DecisionProblem,
questionUtility over ℝ) and mathlib's loss scale
(ProbabilityTheory.bayesRisk over ℝ≥0∞): for a bound C above every
utility, the Bayes risk of the partition experiment under the regret loss
C − U equals C minus the partition's decision value
(bayesRisk_deterministic_regretLoss). Through it, [vR03a]'s §4.1
Fact becomes a biconditional theorem about the Blackwell order:
- forward (
questionUtility_comp_le): coarsening the classifier cannot raise question utility — the partition instance of the data-processing inequalitybayesRisk_deterministic_le_deterministic_comp; - converse (
factorsThrough_of_forall_questionUtility_le): a partition whose question utility is dominated in every decision problem factors through the dominating one — the Blackwell–Sherman–Stein converse (isGarblingOf_of_blackwellDominates) plus the deterministic factoring characterization (Kernel.deterministic_isGarblingOf_deterministic_iff).
The prior of a decision problem as a measure: the weighted sum of Dirac
masses ∑ w, ofReal (prior w) • δ_w.
Equations
- dp.priorMeasure = ∑ w : W, ENNReal.ofReal (dp.prior w) • MeasureTheory.Measure.dirac w
Instances For
The regret loss at bound C: ℓ(w, a) = C − U(w, a), clamped into
ℝ≥0∞. For C above every utility this is the order-reversing change of
scale between utilities and losses.
Equations
- dp.regretLoss C w a = ENNReal.ofReal (C - dp.utility w a)
Instances For
Finite subtypes of actions carry the discrete σ-algebra.
Instances For
Utility–loss duality: for a classifier classify : W → O, the Bayes
risk of the deterministic experiment "observe the cell of w" under the
regret loss at C, with actions restricted to acts, is C minus the
partition's decision value ∑_o P(o)·V(D ∣ fiber o). The optimal estimator
is best-action-per-cell, and mathlib's bayesRisk and [vR03a]'s
conditional value compute the same quantity on opposite scales.
[vR03a] §4.1, forward direction, from the Blackwell order:
coarsening the classifier by post-composition cannot raise question utility.
The partition instance of bayesRisk_deterministic_le_deterministic_comp,
transported along the duality.
[vR03a] §4.1, converse direction (Blackwell–Sherman–Stein):
if the partition of g has question utility dominated by that of f in
every decision problem over action space O', then g factors through
f — the coarse question is genuinely a coarsening. Chains the utility–loss
duality against isGarblingOf_of_bayesRisk_uniform_le (only finite losses at the
uniform prior are needed) and the deterministic-factoring characterization
Kernel.deterministic_isGarblingOf_deterministic_iff.