Generalized Quantifier Properties — Theorems #
@cite{barwise-cooper-1981} @cite{keenan-stavi-1986} @cite{peters-westerstahl-2006} @cite{van-benthem-1984} @cite{van-benthem-1986} @cite{icard-2012}
Theorems about GQ properties: duality, conservativity/symmetry/strength, left monotonicity and smoothness, Boolean closure, type ⟨1⟩ theorems, van Benthem characterization, and entailment-signature bridge.
Outer negation reverses scope monotonicity: mon↑ → mon↓. B&C Theorem C9.
Outer negation reverses scope monotonicity: mon↓ → mon↑. B&C Theorem C9.
Inner negation reverses scope monotonicity: mon↑ → mon↓ (B&C §4.11).
Inner negation reverses scope monotonicity: mon↓ → mon↑ (B&C §4.11).
Outer negation reverses restrictor monotonicity: mon↑ → mon↓.
Outer negation reverses restrictor monotonicity: mon↓ → mon↑.
Outer negation preserves QuantityInvariant: if Q is bijection-invariant, so is ~Q.
Inner negation preserves QuantityInvariant: if Q is bijection-invariant, so is Q~.
Dual preserves QuantityInvariant.
Meet preserves QuantityInvariant.
Conservative + intersection condition → symmetric (B&C Theorem C5). Proof: by conservativity Q(A,B) = Q(A, A∩B) and Q(B,A) = Q(B, B∩A); both have the same restrictor∩scope = A∩B, so intersection condition equates them.
Scope-downward monotonicity is equivalent to scope-upward monotonicity of the inner negation (co-property characterization, P&W §3.2.4).
Under conservativity, symmetric ↔ intersective (P&W Ch.6 Fact 1). This is the single most important bridge theorem — it explains why weak determiners allow there-insertion.
Non-trivial symmetric quantifiers are not positive strong (P&W Ch.6 Fact 7).
Conservativity of a GQ is equivalent to its restricted quantifiers living on their restrictors (P&W §3.2.2).
Every GQ α satisfies Extension: the representation is universe-free.
@cite{van-benthem-1984}: Under Extension (free for GQ α), Conservativity is equivalent to LivesOn — the restricted quantifier depends only on elements of its restrictor.
Persistence → ↑_SE Mon.
Persistence → ↑_SW Mon.
↑_SW Mon ∧ ↑_SE Mon → Persistence (@cite{peters-westerstahl-2006} Prop 6).
Persistence ↔ ↑_SW Mon ∧ ↑_SE Mon (@cite{peters-westerstahl-2006} Prop 6).
Anti-persistence → ↓_NW Mon.
Anti-persistence → ↓_NE Mon.
↓_NW Mon ∧ ↓_NE Mon → Anti-persistence.
Anti-persistence ↔ ↓_NW Mon ∧ ↓_NE Mon.
CONSERV ∧ Smooth → Mon↑ (@cite{peters-westerstahl-2006} Prop 9).
CONSERV ∧ QSymmetric → ↑_SW Mon ∧ ↓_NE Mon (@cite{peters-westerstahl-2006} Prop 7).
↑_SW Mon ∧ ↓_NE Mon → QSymmetric (under CONSERV).
@cite{peters-westerstahl-2006} Prop 7: a CONSERV type ⟨1,1⟩ quantifier is symmetric iff it satisfies ↑_SW Mon and ↓_NE Mon.
Conservativity is closed under complement.
Conservativity is closed under meet.
Conservativity is closed under join.
K&S PROP 6: Meet of scope-↑ functions is scope-↑.
K&S PROP 6: Meet of scope-↓ functions is scope-↓.
K&S PROP 6: Join of scope-↑ functions is scope-↑.
K&S PROP 3: Conservativity is preserved under adjectival restriction.
K&S PROP 5: Scope-upward monotonicity is preserved under adjectival restriction.
K&S PROP 5: Scope-downward monotonicity is preserved under adjectival restriction.
Montagovian individuals are upward closed (ultrafilter property).
Montagovian individuals are closed under intersection.
@cite{van-benthem-1984} Theorem 3.1.1: Under conservativity, inclusion (⊆) is the only reflexive antisymmetric quantifier.
@cite{van-benthem-1984} Thm 4.1.1 (Zwarts): reflexive + transitive → MON↑.
@cite{van-benthem-1984} Thm 4.1.1 (Zwarts): reflexive + transitive → ↓MON.
@cite{van-benthem-1984} Thm 4.1.3 (Zwarts): for symmetric quantifiers, scope-↑ implies quasi-reflexive, under CONSERV.
@cite{van-benthem-1984} Thm 4.1.3 (Zwarts): for symmetric quantifiers, scope-↓ implies quasi-universal, under CONSERV.
Right-monotone quantifiers are right-continuous.
@cite{van-benthem-1984} Thm 4.1.2: irreflexive + almost-connected → MON↓.
@cite{van-benthem-1984} Thm 4.1.2: irreflexive + almost-connected → ↑MON.
Asymmetric quantifiers are irreflexive.
Asymmetric implies antisymmetric (vacuously).
Circular + symmetric → quasi-reflexive.
Circularity + reflexivity → symmetry.
@cite{peters-westerstahl-2006} Prop 6.59 (fixed-domain version): Under CONSERV + ISOM + asymmetry, ¬Q(A,B) whenever |A \ B| = |B \ A|.
@cite{van-benthem-1984} Cor 3.3.2: Under conservativity, the ONLY symmetric quasi-reflexive quantifier is overlap (= "some").
@cite{van-benthem-1984} Cor 3.3.3: Under conservativity, the ONLY symmetric quasi-universal quantifier is disjointness (= "no").
Map a pair of entailment signatures (restrictor, scope) to DoubleMono,
the @cite{van-benthem-1984} double monotonicity classification.
Returns none for signature pairs that don't correspond to a standard
generalized quantifier pattern.
Equations
- Core.Quantification.EntailmentSig.pairToDoubleMono Core.NaturalLogic.EntailmentSig.additive Core.NaturalLogic.EntailmentSig.additive = some Core.Quantification.DoubleMono.upUp
- Core.Quantification.EntailmentSig.pairToDoubleMono Core.NaturalLogic.EntailmentSig.antiAdd Core.NaturalLogic.EntailmentSig.mult = some Core.Quantification.DoubleMono.downUp
- Core.Quantification.EntailmentSig.pairToDoubleMono Core.NaturalLogic.EntailmentSig.additive Core.NaturalLogic.EntailmentSig.antiMult = some Core.Quantification.DoubleMono.upDown
- Core.Quantification.EntailmentSig.pairToDoubleMono Core.NaturalLogic.EntailmentSig.antiAdd Core.NaturalLogic.EntailmentSig.antiAdd = some Core.Quantification.DoubleMono.downDown
- Core.Quantification.EntailmentSig.pairToDoubleMono x✝¹ x✝ = none
Instances For
"every" has signature (◇, ⊞) = (antiAdd in restrictor, mult in scope).
Equations
Instances For
"some" has signature (⊕, ⊕) = (additive in both arguments).
Equations
Instances For
"no" has signature (◇, ◇) = (antiAdd in both arguments).
Equations
Instances For
"not every" has signature (⊕, ⊟) = (additive in restrictor, antiMult in scope).