⚠️ LEGACY — RESTORED SHIM (2026-05-13) #
Restored from commit e0876460^ after deletion at 0.230.913. Consumer migration
(Phase D per scratch/mcb_full_architecture.md) hadn't happened. Will be re-deleted
when Phase D lands — predicates here will be re-derived on the new substrate
(cutSummandsCP / Planar (α ⊕ β)), matching the new cut-multiset shape rather
than the old per-tree CutShape type.
Do not extend, do not add new consumers.
Cut-avoiding trees in the Connes-Kreimer coproduct #
@cite{marcolli-chomsky-berwick-2025} @cite{foissy-2002}
A pure structural condition on TraceTree α β: when does a tree T "avoid"
a target X? Answer: T ≠ X and no admissible cut on T extracts X as
a subforest element. Equivalently — interpreted in the Connes-Kreimer Hopf
algebra — no summand M ⊗ R of the deletion coproduct Δ^d T has X ∈ M.
This predicate has nothing to do with any particular linguistic theory; it
is a relation between trees in the Connes-Kreimer combinatorial substrate.
Generic over leaf alphabet α and trace alphabet β. Defined here so that
any consumer (Minimalism-style algebraic Merge per
@cite{marcolli-chomsky-berwick-2025}, TAG-via-Hopf, categorial-grammar
combinators, renormalization-style "avoid these counterterms") can reuse it.
Contents #
CutAvoiding X T: per-target, per-tree predicate.CutAvoidingForest F W: per-target-forest, per-workspace predicate (every component ofWavoids every element ofF).- Namespace lemmas:
CutAvoidingForest.empty,CutAvoidingForest.of_cons,CutAvoidingForest.head,CutAvoidingForest.not_mem,CutAvoidingForest.no_cut.
A tree T avoids the target X in the Connes-Kreimer coproduct:
T ≠ X and no admissible cut on T extracts X as a subforest
element. Equivalently, no summand M ⊗ R of Δ^d T has X ∈ M.
- ne_self : T ≠ X
Tis not literally the targetX. No admissible cut on
TextractsXas a subforest element.
Instances For
A workspace W : TraceForest α β is F-avoiding (component-wise):
every component T of W avoids every target X in the forest F.
Equations
- ConnesKreimer.CutAvoidingForest F W = ∀ T ∈ W, ∀ X ∈ F, ConnesKreimer.CutAvoiding X T
Instances For
Empty workspace is trivially F-avoiding for any target forest F.
Cons preservation: if T ::ₘ W is F-avoiding then so is W.
Cons head: if T ::ₘ W is F-avoiding then T avoids every X ∈ F.
Workspace-level: no target X ∈ F is a member of the workspace W.
Workspace-level: no admissible cut on any component T ∈ W extracts
any target X ∈ F.
For a workspace T ::ₘ W avoiding the pair-target forest {S, S'},
extract both per-tree avoidances at T. Convenience lemma for the
common two-target case (e.g., MCB algebraic Merge with operands S, S').
For a workspace W avoiding the pair-target forest {S, S'}, neither
target is a member of W. Convenience for the two-target case.