Documentation

Linglib.Core.Agreement.Target

Agreement Target Hierarchy @cite{corbett-1991} #

The Agreement Hierarchy (@cite{corbett-1991}) ranks morphosyntactic targets by likelihood of showing agreement: attributive adjectives are most likely, verbs least likely. If a language shows gender/number agreement on a lower target, it shows agreement on all higher targets.

This type is shared by gender typology (Linglib/Typology/Gender.lean and Phenomena/Gender/Studies/Corbett1991.lean) and number agreement (Phenomena/Agreement/Studies/Corbett2000.lean).

Morphosyntactic targets where agreement can surface, ordered by the Agreement Hierarchy (@cite{corbett-1991}).

Higher rank = more likely to show agreement (closer to controller). Lower rank = less likely (further from controller, more semantic).

Instances For
    @[implicit_reducible]
    Equations
    Equations
    Instances For

      Numeric rank in the Agreement Hierarchy: higher = more likely to show agreement (more syntactic); lower = less likely (more semantic).

      Equations
      Instances For
        @[implicit_reducible]

        The Agreement Hierarchy is a LinearOrder lifted from the rank. Provides , <, min, max, Finset.sort, etc. for free.

        Equations
        theorem Core.AgreementTarget.rank_injective :
        Function.Injective rank

        The hierarchy rank is injective — derivable from the LinearOrder instance, restated here as a named lemma for direct invocation.

        The Predicate Hierarchy (@cite{corbett-2000}) decomposes the predicate position on the Agreement Hierarchy into a sub-hierarchy: verb < participle < adjective < noun.

        Semantic agreement increases monotonically along this sub-hierarchy: if semantic agreement is possible on a verb, it is possible on a participle; if on a participle, then on an adjective; etc.

        This is orthogonal to AgreementTarget, which treats .predicate and .verb as two positions on the main hierarchy. The Predicate Hierarchy provides finer resolution within the predicate position.

        Instances For
          @[implicit_reducible]
          Equations
          Equations
          Instances For

            Rank in the Predicate Hierarchy: higher = more likely to show semantic agreement. verb (0) < participle (1) < adjective (2) < noun (3).

            Equations
            Instances For
              @[implicit_reducible]

              The Predicate Hierarchy is a LinearOrder lifted from the rank.

              Equations
              theorem Core.PredicateTarget.rank_injective :
              Function.Injective rank

              The Predicate Hierarchy rank is injective.

              Whether agreement markers have referential autonomy. @cite{bickel-nichols-2001}

              • grammatical: pure agreement — the marker cannot stand alone as an argument; an independent NP is required (English she walk-s, the -s cannot replace she)
              • pronominal: cross-referencing — the marker can function as the sole expression of the argument; an independent NP is optional (Swahili a-li-ki-soma (kitabu) — the prefixes suffice without the noun)

              This distinction is orthogonal to the Agreement Hierarchy: a language can have pronominal agreement on verbs but grammatical agreement on adjectives, or vice versa.

              Instances For
                @[implicit_reducible]
                Equations
                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For

                  Direction of agreement: which element originates ("drives") the features. @cite{bickel-nichols-2001} §9

                  • headDriven: the phrasal head provides features that percolate to its dependents — dependents carry the agreement morphology. (German/Watam NP concord: noun's gender/number → adjective, det; = dependent marking in the sense of §3.)
                  • dependentDriven: a dependent provides features that the head matches — the head carries the agreement morphology. (Belhare/Swahili verb agreement: subject's person/number → verb; = head marking in the sense of §3.)

                  Related to but distinct from Core.Morphology.LocusOfMarking: locus is a language-level WALS typological parameter classifying where all grammatical relations are marked (head, dependent, double, zero). AgreementDirection is phenomenon-specific — a language can be overall head-marking (LocusOfMarking.headMarking) yet have specific head-driven agreement (e.g., NP concord in an otherwise head-marking language).

                  Instances For
                    @[implicit_reducible]
                    Equations
                    Equations
                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                    Instances For